<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>CACTUS</provider_name><provider_url>https://cactusglobal.com</provider_url><author_name>David Burbridge</author_name><author_url>https://cactusglobal.com/media-center/author/david-burbridge/</author_url><title>Geographical Differences in Open Access Ecosystems: Implications for Research Societies and Publishers - CACTUS</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="VIpO2G6mVY"&gt;&lt;a href="https://cactusglobal.com/media-center/geographical-differences-in-open-access-ecosystems-implications-for-research-societies-and-publishers/"&gt;Geographical Differences in Open Access Ecosystems: Implications for Research Societies and Publishers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://cactusglobal.com/media-center/geographical-differences-in-open-access-ecosystems-implications-for-research-societies-and-publishers/embed/#?secret=VIpO2G6mVY" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Geographical Differences in Open Access Ecosystems: Implications for Research Societies and Publishers&#x201D; &#x2014; CACTUS" data-secret="VIpO2G6mVY" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://cactusglobal.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://cactusglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/CC_IS_Blog-Banner_Geographical-Differences-scaled-1.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>2560</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>1308</thumbnail_height><description>Open access (OA) has moved from a niche challenger to conventional scholarly publishing, to a movement that is transforming the traditional academic publishing landscape. In response to the rise of OA and the overall shift to open science, many publishers and societies have shifted to fully open or hybrid OA models to meet the increasing [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
